Saturday, 28 June 2008

Unintended Consequences of Drug Use, Laws, Policy and Policing Practices: LSD and Operation Julie



Turn On Tune In Drop Out and Get Arrested


WillonaSaturday

In keeping with the theme of drug related incidents with unexpected consequences I would submit the case of Operation Julie as a classic of its kind in more ways than one.

Operation Julie was the codename given by the police to their efforts to curtail the manufacture and distribution of LSD in the 1970s – an enterprise which, though undeniably criminal, was organised by an unlikely grouping of highly educated and well connected individuals who saw themselves not so much as criminals but, as one of the gang described, as ‘psychic guerrillas’ who genuinely believed that the world would be a better place the more people took LSD thereby expanding their consciousness. An important aspect of such an ideal was that the quality of their product was not to be compromised in the interests of increased profits. Amongst their number were university graduates (still something of a rarity in those days) and the son of an RAF squadron leader and between them they had just one conviction (for theft and false pretences). The leader of this gang of bright young things first became aware of Operation Julie when he discovered his front door being given a serious pounding and on unbolting and opening the door he was obliged to take evasive action from the swinging sledgehammer being wielded by an enthusiastic plain clothes police officer: ‘I suppose you’ve come about the TV licence’ was the initial inquiry levelled at the raiding party!

Operation Julie netted some six million LSD trips and effectively eliminated the entire supply of the drug, but not without some unintended consequences. At the London end, the operation involving a police raid on a manufacturing laboratory where a spillage caused a carpet to become saturated with LSD, which in turn led to three of the raiding party inadvertently ingesting some of the drug and their subsequent statements shed some light on the events that followed. After the raid some of the officers went to a nearby pub to celebrate - by which time the hallucinogenic properties of LSD began to have some effect: one of the team thought his pint had become to heavy to lift, while another became fascinated with the foam on the top of his glass and the third simply hid behind a pillar. On leaving the pub they found themselves incapable of reversing their car out of the car park and they decided to walk back to the laboratory pointing out to one another as one of the officers later put it, ‘the thousand mysteries of the south-western suburbs’. They were eventually found collapsed with laughter watching Jesus of Nazareth on TV and were duly taken to Kingston hospital where, readers will be pleased to learn, they were ultimately found to be none the worse for their experience!

In policing terms, above episode notwithstanding, Operation Julie was a spectacular success and, at the time, the largest of its kind in Europe.

The gang of psychic guerrillas received jail sentences totalling 124 years and on release in the 1980s, suitably chastened, they pursued more conventional careers – one even became a police surgeon. However, a particularly unforeseen and unfortunate consequence of such success would ultimately emerge. With LSD no longer available many of the drug’s aficionados turned to alternative means with which to get wasted and for many that would be barbiturates, not only a nasty drug but an extremely dangerous one too. At the height of their popularity in the 1970s barbiturates were claiming some 2000 lives a year as well as many amputations following botched attempts to inject the drug. For all the sensationalist moral panics directed at LSD – almost all of which had no basis in fact – the harm caused by that drug was a drop in the ocean compared to the catalogue of damage resulting from barbiturate use. Furthermore, when LSD eventually resurfaced it was in the hands of people with far less scruples than the targets of Operation Julie and would mostly be a mixture of amphetamine and substances such as strychnine and belladonna.

Operation Julie thus provides a salutary tale of unintended consequences and while there are many who would love to see all traces of illicit drugs removed from the streets of Britain, they would do well to consider the sort of mayhem that such an unlikely outcome could well precipitate.



Will Scarlet


7 comments:

Anonymous said...

Inspired to go and read about Operation Julie, I found that it was centred on Llanddewi Brefi, now famous as the home of the 'only gay in the village'.

Robin Hood (Robin of Sherwood) said...

ANONYMOUS - :-) might explain that too-tight plasic outfit?

Will - I saw Amy Winehouse heading the bill at Nelson Mandela’s 90th birthday bash at Hyde Park on the TV last night. She looked unwell many ways ...what the half- hoisting of the front of her min-skirt like a toddler needing to find the WC quickly was all about I'm sure that even she could not coherently explain.

Anyway I read now that she has developed the debilitating heart and lung disease emphysema and that this is all due to smoking crack (Metro June 23 2008, p 12). Compare this news then to the coming of a TV programme "Wasted" (Sky TV Chanel 193/Virgin channel 155 - to coincide with Drug and Alcohol Awareness Week) reveals the process by which cocaine is manufactured by Columbian producers adding ammonia and concrete dust to the drug - I wonder if it is actually these toxic additives that are more likely to have cause Amy's emphysema than cocaine itself?

Further - could she have been smoking soapblock (cannabis resin block) do you think? Because I note that your earlier drug post revealed that cannabis resin block was also mixed in with harmful to lungs solvents such as boot polish. Might it again be the additives that uncaring criminals put into these drugs that is the biggest villain?

A Wench said...

Might also explain the reference to rug munching ....

A Wench said...

Will - what do you know of the rationale behind outlawing possession and consumption of fresh psilocybin mushrooms in 2005 - do you know if that has had any unintended consequences?

Anonymous said...

ROBIN - yes I have no doubt that attributing harm done to conveniently scapegoated substances whilst wilfully ignoring the full picture and particularly the part played by known and unknown adulterants and the harm they cause, is an entrenched aspect of the policy propaganda machine and will be the subject of a forthcoming blog.

WENCH - how generous of you to look for some rationale in government drug policy! What rationale can there be for making something that grows freely with virtually no history of causing harm, a class A drug alongside heroin and crack?! At the time, Paul Goggins the Home Office mouthpiece said: 'By clarifying the law we are making it clear that we will not allow the sale and supply of magic mushrooms...this will benefit people likely to be at risk from the dangerous effects of magic mushrooms and will bring to an end profiteering in fresh mushrooms by growing numbers of vendors.'
I am as yet unaware of any unintended consequences (or any intended ones for that matter) although I live in hope that the Queen will be arrested for cultivation when some 'shrooms' are found growing in the grounds of one of her various properties!

A Wench said...

Hi Anonymous,

Sorry, I meant 'rationale' in the sense of 'official explanation' or 'what the hell were they thinking'? The Home Office might have a rationale, but that does not mean that I am crediting them with being rational - also, their rationale may have less to do with the drugs themselves and more to do with politics - so I was wondering about any other tune they might be knee-jerking in time to. Groggin's rhetoric certainly doesn't give many clues. I'll stop being so lazy and go and search around a bit.

As for the Queen, well there is a precedent - wasn't Queen Victoria a laudanum addict?

A Wench said...

Back again, having done a bit of homework.

Strikes me, from a visit to the Home Office website, that there was a definite undercurrent of embarrassment that HMRC were having to collect VAT from the burgeoning legal trade in spores and unpreserved mushrooms.

The concerns about unintended consequences seem to centre around a switch from Liberty Cap mushrooms to the still legal Amanita Muscaria, which is thought to be more toxic (unless first passed through a reindeer), or the ingestion of deadly mushrooms by inexperienced foragers. Another worry was that users would revert to LSD, speed and ecstasy.

I haven't found any signs yet that the Government is monitoring for adverse consequences of the ban.

Me - I'll be keeping a close eye on the Cairngorm Reindeer Centre!