Monday, 9 June 2008

A Wench’s Monday Blog: The Fatal Allure of Bad and Therefore Exciting Men





The Bad-Man Syndrome

I can’t help thinking girly thoughts from time to time. And an age-old girly cliché has recently cropped up in connection with someone I hold very dear. Could someone please give me the definitive answer to the question:

‘Why do nice girls fall for bad boys?’

I’m not talking here about hybristophilia, where women in their idiotic droves offer marriage to serial killers but, rather, the allure of the bad boy image. Why was it so believable that the Fonz got more action than Richie Cunningham (Happy Days)? Why did Spike have a bigger fan base than Xander (Buffy the Vampire Slayer)? Do boys engage in deviant behaviour because they believe that it makes them look cooler in the eyes of girls and, thus, more likely to get laid?

Are these just frivolous cultural tropes that have no place in any serious criminological discussion?

Believe it or not, some serious scholarship has gone into an analysis of Spike-appeal (thank heavens I’m not alone in my sad girlyness). Milly Williamson (2005) concludes that it is ‘Spike’s sympathetic, pathos-ridden existence’ and ‘the subcultural reading of the ‘cool bad boy’ vampire as signifying hidden suffering’ that draws such a strong empathic reaction. Hmm, I’m not so sure. There is currently a fierce debate in cyberspace about the relative ‘hotness’ of vampire private investigators, Angel and Mick St John (that's him on the right) – I’ll let you draw your own conclusions about pathos versus Eros.

My 17 year old niece has fallen for someone that her parents think is totally unsuitable.
I was called upon, as an additional stodgy adult voice, to explain to her why (despite all the mistakes my generation made at her age) we want her to drop the boy and focus on her studies.

It’s because we love you and we want you to have everything; we don’t want you to limit your choices now by getting tied down with some guy” was my first rather feeble attempt. I could tell that she wasn’t convinced. I tried scare tactics instead:
Look ... we’ve got a duty to get you through these next few years – they’re the most dangerous of your life”.

“Oh, yes, why is that?”, she enquired politely.

Because you want the freedom, but you don’t have the experience to back it up. We just want to keep the boys alive. You never knew your Uncle Philip – he died at 17 on a motorbike that he shouldn’t have been riding. But as a girl, we’re most scared that you are going to get pregnant”.

All of this had the advantage of being the truth.

But it really got me thinking. What she wanted to do (and what we didn’t want her to do) was the most natural thing in the world.
It seems so strange that we pathologise teenage pregnancy. In fact, the so-called deviant behaviour of some boys reminds me of nothing so much as a mating display. But this is something that research is oddly silent about.

I went on a brief hunt for scholarly articles about human mate selection and deviant behaviour as an extreme form of display. I found only a very few suggestive pieces. Xie et al (2006: 608) tell us that the older children get, the more accepting they are of aggression and deviance; they also found that girls were ‘more acute observers of social status and peer relations in the network’. Kierkus (2008: 3158) felt that there ‘was evidence that sexual activity may be the key risk factor [for delinquency] for males, while mixed gender peer relationships are most salient for females’.

In other words, boys may be motivated to get into trouble by sex and girls may be more highly motivated by pecking order. Boys are busy displaying and girls are busy judging.

I wonder what chemicals are released in the brain of a male bird of paradise to reward it for shaking its tail feathers. Are they the same that are released when a young male human is actively engaged in reckless thrill-seeking behaviour?

Are we handicapped by a religious heritage that insists we are made in God’s image, denying our animal nature as blasphemy?

I had better stop here, now that I have offended all the major religions and every feminist I ever knew.

a Wench

References:

Kierkus, C.A. (2008) ‘Bad influences? Developing an understanding of the link between opposite sex relationships and delinquency, during the adolescent development period’, Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 68(7-A): 3158.

Williamson, M. (2005) ‘Spike, sex and subtext: Intertextual portrayals of the sympathetic vampire on cult television’, European Journal of Cultural Studies, 8: 289.

Xie, H., Li, Y., Boucher, S.M., Hutchins, B.C. and Cairns, B.D. (2006) ‘What Makes a Girl (or a Boy) Popular (or Unpopular)? African American Children’s Perceptions and Developmental Differences’, Developmental Psychology, 42(4): 599-612.




6 comments:

Anonymous said...

As you say, boys are busy displaying while girls are busy judging - it's what goes on the world over in the animal kingdom so why would we be different. I can also confirm as a former 'bad boy' who made his living for many years by defrauding banks, that girls who wouldn't look at me once, never mind twice, suddenly saw things rather differently when they they discovered how I got a bit of wedge. As the old country song said 'Ladies love outlaws, like babies love stray dogs' - at least until the novelty wears off!

A Wench said...

Anon,

Yes, I think Will asked in an earlier blog whether a bit of bentness was beneficial. If this is true, then bentness might be well-nigh essential.

There are some implications for diversionary projects. Although the males of many species do injure each other seriously when jousting for mates, others have ritualised the process to render it less harmful.

So, when trying to divert youths from crime, should we be offering them improved life opportunities through skills training, or improved showing-off opportunities just to tide them over the most dangerous years.

I'm going to keep my recommendations for girls quiet for a bit, so that I don't get heavily stomped on by daisy-patterned Doc Martens.

AngryDave said...

A excellent post!
Much of our behaviour is dominated by sexual urges, and attracting a mate.
It's true that many of the explanations upset feminists and religion, but the facts are there ans should not be disregarded because they off end these groups. The fact remains that the sexes are different, and they are gonna have dispositions to different types of roles and behaviour. If you look at the second part of Darwin's theory of evolution, you will see that the successful species reach a level where they force their own evolution. This is done by mastering control of our environment. It is fascinating that those cultures that still choose to follow older more primative ways of life seem to be happier, maybe it is due to less conflict between them and natures programming. Now we are left with a confrontation between natures plans and our own self created (as a species) goals. I could go on for hours about it but i feel that it will take up too much space here and many people would get bored.

Sorry! about the delay in my response, i am fit enough to go back to work now.

Bent Society said...

AngryDave - glad you are better.

I think there's a lot in evolutionary psychology that can provide a fitting explanation for so many things. Whether it's right I don't know but it does make intuitive sense.

If you think about jealousy for example - even when we are glad that someone has had some great luck or earned some success we feel a tinge of the green eyed monster. This is probably a universal human phenomenon and may result from millions of years of genetic selection favouring the jealous-gene.

Then take snobbery and smugness - how many times do we "pooh-pooh" the successes of people like Donald Trump by laughing at his hair. Is this because nature favoured the smug-gene in that it enabled ancient people to avoid fighting competitive battles with people they could not beat. You can imagine the guy in the cave talking to his cave buddies: "Huh well Ugp may have the best woman and the biggest spear but just look at his crap cave painting! And that overhanging brow of his who’d want to be him"

A Wench said...

Hi AngryDave,

I'm also glad to hear that you're feeling much better... but that work stuff is no friend to blogging!

There is a lot of mileage in some of these ideas - I've been trying to tackle Marcus Felson's 'Crime and Nature', but I think that he bottled it - he should have taken the analogy and ran much further than he did.

Phillip said...

The bad boy figure comes from the media interpretation of how boys & girls should relate with each other. It is not a classical literary story instead is something that goes back to the early media of the U.S.

We can look at the "Little Rascals"; even though Alfalfa was nice to Darla , she continued to chase Butch. The purpose was to keep the story line interesting although such imagery does have an affect on girls psyche.

Another example would be Popeye the Sailorman. Even though he was nice to Olive Oil, she was still attracted to Bluto. Again, this makes the storyline interesting although it gives girls a false impression of gender roles.

For girls who do not have good parental supervision during their adolescent years this mirroring of the media can make their adult choice of love companions less then perfect.

It can make them chase the bad guy, even if he physically and mentally abuses her.

A woman simply needs to recognize this and make changes to leave the bad guy or make prudent efforts in helping him change.