Wednesday, 30 July 2008

Problematic Tail Wagging Policy For The Recreational Dog


The Drugs Policies Don’t Work - Letting The Problematic Tail Wag The Recreational Dog!

WillonaWednesday

Yet another report released today is telling us that the criminal justice-led policies at the forefront of the so-called war on drugs for so long are having no effect either on supply or demand, meaning that billions of pounds of taxpayers’ money continue to be poured down the drain with nothing to show for it. Well, what a surprise!

For 40 odd years successive governments have clung to the belief that drug-taking is immoral and must be regarded primarily as a criminal justice issue despite the undeniable fact that throughout all this time drug use has increased, drugs are increasingly available and cheaper and usage begins at an increasingly earlier age. All of which demonstrates clearly that the policies don’t work, yet, just like some frazzled old junkie, our politicians stubbornly cling to the view that just one more fix of the same measure and everything will be alright. Will we ever get a government brave enough to recognise two fundamental truths? Firstly, the refusal to recognise the key distinction between recreational and problematic use and that drug use, drug abuse and drug misuse are not interchangeable synonyms, can only hamper any sensible drug strategy and secondly, the provision of drug education in this country is a miserable, ineffectual failure.

When it came to alcohol, the reasoning behind the recent relaxation of licensing laws was a recognition that the prevailing law was outmoded and that the problems caused by a minority of problematic drinkers should not dictate overall policy and its impact on responsible, recreational consumers who were believed to be in the majority. The fact that these provisions have not proved to be the spectacular success that was hoped for and the various health and social problems, as well as the crime generated by alcohol are increasingly evident is because these issues are a function of complex, deep-seated cultural factors which the law alone is incapable of addressing. Such matters must be responded to primarily via a responsible and honest education system and it must be accepted that this would be a long-term project - the idea that Britain could be transformed, almost overnight, into a European-style café society is obviously ludicrous. However, the distinction between problematic and recreational use and the recognition that the problematic tail should not wag the recreational dog is laudable - why then cannot the same distinction and recognition be made in respect of drugs?

While it is impossible to gauge with any great accuracy the extent of drug use in Britain, it can be said that it constitutes a multi-million pound market and that millions of people take drugs regularly up and down the country. The focus is almost exclusively on the problems attributed to drug use creating an implicit assumption that all drug taking is problematic thus denying not only the possibility, but the probability, that most of this use is recreational and non-problematic - the problematic tail therefore wags the recreational dog. All drug users are then reliant on a completely unregulated black market controlled by criminals with no provision for quality of product and are exposed to the vagaries of a criminal justice system which tends to view drug taking as evidence of some moral turpitude, while our children are denied access to honest, objective information about drugs which includes the fact that drugs can be a source of fun and pleasure as well as potentially dangerous.

Yes, drugs can create enormous problems including crime, ill-health and death with all the associated misery for families and communities which frequently dominate the headlines and none more so than heroin yet arguably no drug is more misunderstood than heroin. I have little doubt that most people would be staggered to learn that heroin when it is pure and administered in a safe environment is actually a benign substance - it does not attack and damage the body’s vital organs, brain, liver, lungs, heart, kidneys, in the way that other drugs, including alcohol do. In fact, constipation and a lowering of libido are likely to be the principal side effects of safely administered clean heroin and it is commonly used by medical professionals because of its efficacy in managing pain. The big problem with heroin is its addictiveness which can quite literally enslave an addict particularly one who is reliant on a ruthless black market which is where the problems we have become accustomed to begin to arise. It is not the drug itself which generates the problems, but the lifestyle that comes with black market dependence - the adulterated product, the hazardous consumption methods, the association with criminals and the desperation.

The notion of providing prescribed heroin to entrenched addicts and ensuring its safe administration is usually associated with woolly headed liberals, but we should remember that Switzerland, not a country known for its left-liberal politics, successfully implemented a heroin prescription programme and when invited to vote on its continuation, its people, not known for their left-liberal views, voted in favour by a 70% majority because it was effective in reducing crime and it saved taxpayers’ money. And the Swiss government got the idea from us following the model of Dr. John Marks’ Merseyside clinics in the late 1980s which Michael Howard closed down despite their success when he became home secretary (arguably one of the worst in history) because he felt it was morally wrong!!

Finally, a last thought to the right wingers who can’t see past the end of their right wing hooters, which of the following two scenarios would you prefer:

1. You’re walking down the road minding your own business when someone comes up behind you, knocks you down, steals your ipod, wallet, cash, phone, jewellery then gives you a good kicking all because they need money to buy some black market heroin.

2. You’re walking down the same road, still minding your business when the same person comes up behind you, but walks straight past you because they’re on their way to a clinic to get clean, safely administered heroin before going about their crime-free day.

Think about it next time you’re walking down the road minding your own business!

Will

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

Law, laws, policy and local interpretation by performance indicator...

...so they don't work, eh?

All local interpretation and delivery of drug policy is so far away from resolving the problems that they are themselves reduced to a bureaucratic pharmacopaeia of remedies?

Ahhh!... so Damien Hurst, (regular recreational drug user?) and deferential flunky of the expensive place called the modern gallery is a prophet of all we can hope for?

...and because we are in this kind of post modern vortex which always mirrors and refracts the truth of power inequalities into their always fragmented constituents, it is meaningless to fight the inevitable progress of the opiate pain killer driven society?

Do we like painkillers and addiction more than a just society? Why do our soldiers think they are in Afghanistan?

Not poppy research surely? Come back junkies like the black Vietnam vets? Surely not?

What's(really)going on here?

We should question and fight for the time in our work and lives to see policy and projects through creatively. The addictive culture of which drug dependance and addiction is only a part of a culture which includes the way that companies like IBM target our 'cool kids' with subliminal advertising rather than their 'massive passive' parents who by now are totally and fearfully driven to obey their children's 'addicted' demands for more and more of the drug they crave, be it more time, more money? Across all classes but the middle classes get their (hits? kicks?) out of knowing that poor kids have it worse and spend all their time proving it? Yet they bury their doubts and tick the boxes becasue all the payments have been made again this month...

This addictive culture....

And it is the same culture that historically has always mediated the relationships of the poor with their children for institutional, social or financial gain or personal advancement. The very same culture that sends too many people to prison to become brutalised or leaves them on the streets because it doesn't like what the government's doing.

Drugs?

We're happily creating generations of drug users in Nottingham because we are learning to normalise anaesthetising ourselves with drugs, drink, truly dreadful TV, film and media and pretend we can have a meaningful leisure space when really, we're always in the middle of a cesspool of blandness where it's impolite to question the madness of not having the time or the resources to do your job, or career suicide to really make things work for the people you're supposed to be accountable to.

Addiction? mmmm...

You cite a good Swiss based solution to addiction. Did you know that as well as these 'Swiss social remedy' projects, the often Swiss based (and really, believe me, not very forward thinking), rich pharmaceutical companies are conducting research within the NHS to attend to the 'issue' of trainee nurses, for example, being unhappy in pescribing painkillers because of their fears of addiction in their patients?

Naughty free thinkers need controlling, need to get on message but subtley, subtley...Pharmaceutical is good, naturopath bad...

Isn't the real problem that in understanding and implementing law through policy we have the roles and the script already written for us?

Commercial interests, not just the well hyped llegal 'market', want addicts, need addicts to feed their greedy desire for world domination,possibly even sold as an 'elite genetics' where the poor are just experimentation fodder.

The passive acceptance of the clean and tidy Swiss approach to drug addicts is just as nightmareish to me as the horrible thieving hell of our passportless drug addict nobodies.

In my opinion all we really need is a recognition of the complexity of our taken for granted world and a real awareness that we need to bargain for more time to make projects work for everyone.

Anonymous said...

I cannot compete with what is written above - whoever wrote it is caring thinker and a writer with a vision. I just want to add that I saw a wildlife film a few years ago. In it all kinds of animals were deliberately seeking out consciousness changing drugs - there were birds getting drunk on fermenting rotten fruit and monkeys biting on huge sausage sized toxic centipedes etc - for no other reason than the buzz.

Perhaps we have to accept that we are animals too (moral animals) but animals none the less. And getting out-of-our-faces is part of our condition and always will be. ...because apart form sex and violence and conflict what else changes our consciousness?
Oh no its...religion...Argh argh Armageddon and puritanism and fundamentalism and false-conciousness. Give me unconsciousness over false consiousness any day. At least I'll wake up in the morning with a hangover and be rational, if a bit moody. And I can look forward to Friday to do it all again, rather than the day I die.

OldBrock

AngryDave said...

Just to add to the above comment, a bit of useless but interesting info. The discovery of coffe was meant to have been from goat farmers who noticed that there flocks got hyper active after eating certain berries. These berries contained the beans that when raosted and ground, make coffee. Effectively the goats were getting a caffiene rush.

Dont know if this is true or not, but it would be funny if it was.